Table 2. Comparison of AUC test of GGA and MDS methods by deletion noise.
Del Ratio | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | |
CS | GGA-method | 0.9307 | 0.9114 | 0.8661 | 0.7131 |
MDS-method | 0.7059 | 0.6975 | 0.6161 | 0.5226 | |
Y2 | GGA-method | 0.7922 | 0.7676 | 0.7277 | 0.6608 |
MDS-method | 0.5413 | 0.5807 | 0.5973 | 0.5666 | |
VM | GGA-method | 0.8912 | 0.8673 | 0.7893 | 0.7143 |
MDS-method | 0.6602 | 0.6023 | 0.5091 | 0.3635 |
AUC values are computed for both methods under certain level of deletions of true positive PPIs in the original network. ‘Del Ratio’ indicates the ratio between removed true PPIs and the number of PPIs in the original network and the corresponding AUC values are filled in the table.