Skip to main content
. 2011 May 3;6(5):e19404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019404

Table 1. Comparison of the incidence and male-to-female rate of pyloric stenosis at different times and in different parts of the world.

Year studied Authors Area No. of Cases Incidence per 1000 live births M/F rate Trend
1968-1982 Lammer et al. Atlanta, USA 518 1.332.90 (White, M)0.61 (Black, M)0.68 (White, F)0.17 (Black, F) 4.44∶1 NA
1971–1984 Hitchcock et al. Western Australia 602 1.4–2.9 4.9∶1 Increasing
1974–1980 Knox et al. Central Scotland, UK 1176 2.1–3.5 3.1–4.4∶1 Increasing
1976–19781986–1988 Tam et al. Mersey, UK 1.542.22 3.55∶18.35∶1 Increasing
1981–2004 Sommerfield et al. Scotland, UK 4950 4.4–1.4 NA Declining
1983–1988 Schechter et al. California, USA 1963 1.92.4 White1.8 Hispanic,0.7 Black0.6 Asian
1983–1990 Applegate et al. New York, USA 2304 2.4–1.7 4.31∶1 Declining
1987–1996 Hedback et al. Sweden 2157 2.7–0.85 4.15∶1 Declining
1993–19961997–2000 To et al. Ontario, North America 1918 1.81–1.481.55–1.98 4∶1 DecliningIncreasing
1999–2002 Wang et al. Texas, USA 2747 2.14 White2.49 Hispanic-US1.58 Hispanic-F0.83 Blacks0.18 Chinese0.44 Vietnamese0.59 Asian Indians0.43Filipinos
1997–2007 Leong et al.(current study) Taiwan 1077 0.39 4.3∶1 Declining

F indicates female, M indicates male, NA indicates not available, UK indicates United Kingdom, USA indicates United States America, Hispanic-US indicates US-born Hispanic, Hispanic-F indicates foreign-born Hispanic.