Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Jan 20;26(5):509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.010

Table 2.

The average difference between the experimental and simulated kinematic angles and ground reaction forces (GRFs) compared to the average standard deviation (SD) of the experimental data. For each quantity: the average difference (2 SD) is reported.

Controls at
0.6 m/s
Controls at
0.9 m/s
Limited
Community
Community
Kinematic Angles (degrees) Pelvis Obliquity 2.7 (3.9) 1.5 (3.8) 1.5 (7.7) 2.4 (4.3)
Rotation 2.0 (7.5) 3.5 (7.6) 2.3 (13.5) 2.9 (9.9)
Tilt 6.3 (13.5) 9.6 (12.7) 3.1 (13.2) 5.6 (12.8)

Trunk Obliquity 3.0 (5.5) 3.4 (4.9) 2.2 (8.5) 2.4 (8.6)
Rotation 6.3 (11.8) 7.9 (11.2) 4.8 (9.7) 5.0 (12.6)
Tilt 0.5 (15.4) 3.2 (16.3) 2.3 (13.8) 6.7 (16.7)

Ipsilateral/
Paretic Leg
Hip Adduction 3.3 (5.2) 2.1 (5.9) 2.8 (9.5) 7.3 (8.9)
Hip Rotation 8.4 (27.2) 5.2 (28.2) 8.9 (22.7) 16.9 (13.1)
Hip Flexion 6.1 (18.5) 7.4 (17.7) 13.5 (22.0) 12.7 (18.2)
Knee Flexion 4.5 (14.6) 4.3 (13.2) 14.2 (24.9) 5.2 (17.9)
Ankle Dorsiflexion 3.2 (11.4) 6.6 (12.1) 3.9 (11.4) 9.8 (9.7)

Contralateral/
Non-Paretic Leg
Hip Adduction 2.1 (9.0) 1.2 (7.9) 10.2 (12.7) 2.4 (12.0)
Hip Rotation 11.4 (29.2) 4.8 (26.0) 1.6 (19.5) 2.5 (18.9)
Hip Flexion 5.0 (15.3) 5.8 (15.4) 2.9 (21.6) 6.2 (22.5)
Knee Flexion 8.4 (14.8) 2.5 (12.9) 4.5 (17.2) 2.9 (19.7)
Ankle Dorsiflexion 2.3 (10.6) 2.4 (11.3) 1.7 (10.3) 6.1 (7.3)

Forces (%BW) Ipsilateral/
Paretic Leg
A/P GRF 2.4 (5.1) 3.2 (5.5) 1.1 (3.7) 1.9 (4.9)
Vertical GRF 7.0 (18.2) 12.7 (19.4) 6.1 (23.8) 10.9 (27.5)
M/L GRF 1.8 (2.7) 3.1 (2.8) 2.1 (2.6) 0.7 (1.7)

Contralateral/
Non-Paretic Leg
A/P GRF 3.1 (4.5) 1.1 (4.8) 0.7 (4.5) 0.5 (4.6)
Vertical GRF 7.6 (17.0) 7.7 (18.5) 8.7 (26.7) 4.4 (24.3)
M/L GRF 1.4 (3.2) 1.9 (3.3) 1.4 (3.0) 1.1 (3.3)

Average Angle Error (degrees) 4.1 (13.4) 4.5 (12.9) 5.0 (14.9) 6.1 (13.3)
Average GRF Error (%BW) 3.9 (8.5) 4.9 (9.1) 3.3 (10.7) 3.3 (11.0)