Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Jan 24;10(3):375–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00677.x

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Stimulus type influences latency to approach in male titis. Stimulus X2=41.18, df=2, p<0.0001. Males approached their partner (X2=9.10, df=1, p=0.0026) and the stranger female (X2=38.96, df=1, p<0.0001) faster than the empty cage. Bars represent mean latency to approach ± SEM.