Table 5.
Adjusted odds ratios of covariates significantly (p<.05) associated with probability of transitioning from one status to another over one year’s time
| Time 1 status | Time 2 status |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct SEP users | Indirect SEP users | Isolated IDUs | |
| Hartford (ref=Chicago) | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 0.30 | 1.01 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.16 | - | 1.35 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.02 | 0.44 | - |
| Oakland | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 0.48 | 0.83 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.52 | - | 0.89 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.60 | 0.67 | - |
| White/other ethnicity (ref=African American) | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 3.19 | 1.02 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.14 | - | 0.92 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.28 | 1.01 | - |
| Latino | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 1.76 | 1.03 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.11 | - | 0.85 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.22 | 1.26 | - |
| Female (ref=Male) | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 0.91 | 0.65 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.10 | - | 0.99 |
| Isolated IDUs | 0.93 | 0.73 | - |
| >high school education | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| Indirect SEP users | 0.68 | - | 1.07 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.19 | 0.91 | - |
| Stopped by police for drug paraphernalia* | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 1.24 | 0.87 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.29 | - | 1.26 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.29 | 0.96 | - |
| Homeless* | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 1.06 | 1.42 |
| Indirect SEP users | 1.70 | - | 1.09 |
| Isolated IDUs | 0.99 | 1.03 | - |
| Injected speedball | |||
| Direct SEP users | - | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Indirect SEP users | 0.93 | - | 0.86 |
| Isolated IDUs | 1.17 | 1.05 | - |
*
In the past year;
- = reference cell in row. For example, reading from left to right, females who were Direct SEP users at Time 1 were 0.65 times as likely to become Isolated users than to maintain their Direct SEP user status (reference) at Time 2.