Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dent Mater. 2011 Mar 8;27(6):509–519. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.006

Table 2.

Means (standard deviations) for volumetric shrinkage (%)

Nanogel fraction, wt% Resins*
Composites#
Non-reactive nanogels Reactive nanogels
Control 10.66 (0.3)a 5.14 (0.2)a
5 10.27 (0.3)A,a 10.57 (0.4)A,ab 4.78 (0.1)ab
10 10.07 (0.5)A,a 10.07 (0.8)A,ab 4.51 (0.6)b
20 8.75 (0.4)A,b 9.35 (0.4)A,b 4.48 (0.3)b
30 7.92 (0.4)A,b 7.79 (0.1)A,c 4.61 (0.3)b
40 6.04 (0.2)A,c 6.72 (0.4)A,c 3.91 (0.04)c
*

Means with parenthetic standard deviation. Upper case letters indicate that there are no statistical differences between analogous nanogel concentrations within a given row (paired t-test, α=5%). Lower case letters indicate statistical differences within a column (Tukey’s test, α=5%).

#

Composite formulations with fixed barium glass loading (70 wt%) and varied nanogel contents.