Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosomatics. 2009 NOV-DEC;50(6):570–579. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.570

Table 3.

Microvascular and Microvascular Events During Follow up in Relation to Major Depression at 5 year Assessment

Indicators No Major Depression N = 2601 Patients with Major Depression N = 158 Unadjusted t-test or chi square Adjusted§Odds Ratio
Macrovascular or Microvascular Events During Follow-Up (At least 1), N (%)
≥1 Macrovascular Event or Procedure, N (%) 317 (12.2) 31 (19.6) 6.86 1.81
1.18 – 2.80
MI 100 (3.8) 6 (3.8) 0.000 --
Stroke 93 (3.6) 9 (5.7) 1.35 1.75
0.83 – 3.67
Cerebrovascular procedure 16 (0.6) 3 (1.9) 1.97 --
Coronary procedure 182 (7.0) 20 (12.7) 6.27* 1.92*
1.14 – 3.25
PVD procedure 21 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0.44 --
≥1 Microvascular Event, N (%) 823 (31.6) 47 (29.7) 0.16 0.86
0.30 – 1.24
Amputation 25 (1.0) 2 (1.3) 0.000 --
Retinopathy 376 (22.1) 17 (18.9) 0.36 0.69
0.40 – 1.21
Nephropathy 517 (37.9) 33 (41.8) 0.32 1.06
0.65 – 1.71
Total Events (Macrovascular and Microvascular Events & Procedures)
Mean (SD) number of macrovascular events or procedures(0-5) 0.16 (0.46) 0.24 (0.52) 2.17* 1.39*
1.02 – 1.88
Mean (SD) number of microvascular events 0.35 (0.55) 0.33 (0.54) 0.53 0.88
0.64 – 1.21
§

adjusted for non response probability and PHQ depression score groups at baseline assessment

development of retinopathy in patients without previous evidence of retinopathy (eligible patients N = 1787)

development of nephropathy in patients without previous evidence of nephropathy (eligible patients N = 1442)

*

p < .05

p < .01

p < .001