Skip to main content
. 2011 May;6(5):1049–1056. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10451110

Table 3.

Effect of short daily hemodialysis on the IRLS score

IRLS Scale Baseline Month 4 Month 12 Global P
Global score
    per-protocol subcohort 18 (16, 21) 13 (10, 16) 11 (8, 15) 0.001
    ITT subcohort 19 (17, 21) 14 (12, 17) 14 (11, 17) <0.0001
Symptoms severity subscale
    per-protocol subcohort 12 (11, 14) 8 (6, 11) 8 (6, 10) <0.001
    ITT subcohort 13 (11, 14) 9 (8, 11) 9 (8, 11) <0.0001
Impact on daily living subscale
    per-protocol subcohort 3 (3, 4) 3 (2, 4) 2 (1, 3) 0.05
    ITT subcohort 4 (3, 5) 3 (3, 4) 3 (2, 4) 0.003

The data are presented as adjusted means (95% confidence interval). Adjustment variables include use of RLS medications (at any time for per-protocol analysis and at baseline for ITT analysis), time, and interaction of these two variables. The per-protocol subcohort includes 46 participants, and the ITT subcohort includes 94 participants who had RLS at baseline. The global P values are based on testing time (baseline, month 4, and month 12) as a fixed effect from repeated measures analysis of covariance. P < 0.02 for pair-wise comparisons of baseline versus month 4 and month 12 for the IRLS global score and its two subscales (in both per-protocol and ITT subcohort), with the exception of the impact on daily living subscale comparison of baseline versus month 4.