Skip to main content
. 2011 May;6(5):1129–1138. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06340710

Table 5.

Association of mortality with 1-L increase in 4-month running mean of Vm in different subgroups or situations

Factor Subgroup or Situation HR 95% CI P in Subgroup or Condition Interaction P
Direction of change in Vm Decrease in Vm 1.00 (0.97 to 1.04) 0.90
Increase in Vm 1.08 (1.06 to 1.11) <0.001
Weight change >2 kg 1.13 (1.06 to 1.21) <0.001 0.04
−2 to 2 kg 1.10 (1.06 to 1.14) <0.001
< −2 kg 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08) 0.004
Gender Male 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08) 0.004 0.008
Female 1.11 (1.08 to 1.15) <0.001
Baseline Vant Vant < 35 L 1.08 (1.05 to 1.11) <0.001 0.95
Vant > 35 L 1.08 (1.04 to 1.12) <0.001
Diabetic status Nondiabetic 1.09 (1.05 to 1.12) <0.001 0.63
Diabetic 1.07 (1.04 to 1.11) <0.001
Dose group Standard dose 1.10 (1.06 to 1.13) <0.001 0.24
High dose 1.07 (1.04 to 1.10) <0.001
Vascular access issue No access issues 1.07 (1.04 to 1.11) <0.001 0.92
≥1 access issue 1.07 (1.04 to 1.11) <0.001
Vascular access issue or time or shortened time No access or time issues 1.06 (1.03 to 1.10) <0.001 0.40
≥1 access or time issue 1.08 (1.05 to 1.11) <0.001

All HRs are based on time-dependent Cox regressions relating mortality to changes in the 4-month mean Vm levels over the preceding 6 months, adjusting for the case mix variables, baseline anthropometric volume, the assigned dose, and flux groups, and the 4-month running mean volume lagged by 6 months. The analyses were stratified by clinical center. Increases and decreases in the running mean Vm were modeled separately using a linear spline model; only HRs for increases in Vm are shown for the asterisked rows. The HRs evaluate the change in risk associated with a 1-L increase in Vm, which represents 25% of 1 SD (4.01 L) of the changes in the 4-month running mean Vm.