Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D55–D58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh059

Table 2. Bias in tDNA type specificity among integrase tribes.

tDNA Average no. genesa No. tribes Bias ratiob Pbiasc
Ala 4.86 0 <0.08 0.0021
Arg 6.70 14 1.71 0.033
Asn 2.65 2 0.62 >0.1
Asp 2.83 0 <0.14 0.029
Cys 1.28 2 1.27 >0.1
Gln 2.83 2 0.58 >0.1
Glu 3.62 1 0.23 0.060
Gly 5.58 7 1.02 >0.1
His 1.28 1 0.64 >0.1
Ile 3.99 6 1.23 >0.1
Leu 6.94 10 1.18 >0.1
Lys 3.46 4 0.94 >0.1
Met 1.96 1 0.42 >0.1
Phe 1.78 4 1.83 >0.1
Pro 3.17 4 1.03 >0.1
Ser 4.63 12 2.12 0.011
Thr 3.94 5 1.04 >0.1
Trp 1.29 0 <0.32 >0.1
Tyr 1.95 1 0.42 >0.1
Val 4.44 2 0.37 0.086
Init 2.69 1 0.30 >0.1
SeC 0.23 1 3.61 >0.1
tmRNA 1.00 9 7.35 0.0000042
Undetd 0.41 0 <1.01 >0.1
Total 73.51 89    

aAverage per host strain, calculated as follows: for each island within a tribe, tDNA types were counted for the host genome, and counts were averaged with weighting according to the summed within-tribe distance scores for the integrase; these values were then averaged for the 89 tribes.

bBias ratio = No. tribes × Total genes/No. genes/Total tribes.

cThe probability that the observed bias would occur by random assortment, calculated from the binomial distribution.

dAnticodon stem–loop distortion renders type undeterminable; probable pseudogenes.