Table 1.

GO-Module applied to lists of prioritized GO terms^a

Retained features (#K/#GO) (%)	Input	Output			Journal (author year)
	#GO	#K	#T	#F
53	15b	8	2	5	Oncogene (Yamaguchi et al., 2010)
63	24	15	4	5	Nature (Burke et al., 2010)
28	162	46	63	53	Nature (Heinig et al., 2010)
57	65b	37	8	20	Cell (Smukalla et al., 2008)
41	189b	76	47	64	Cell (Smukalla et al., 2008)
50	16	8	2	6	N. Engl. J. Med. (Marcucci et al., 2008)
45	20	9	0	11	Genome Res. (Swanson-Wagner et al. 2010)
91	23	21	2	0	Genome Res. (Mortazavi et al. 2010)
86	35b	30	2	3	Genome Res. (Somel et al. 2010)
90	21b	19	1	1	Genome Res. (Vinuela et al. 2010)
70	30	21	2	7	Genome Res. (Atanur et al. 2010)
46	13	6	2	5	Genome Res. (Hoffman et al. 2010)
40	20b	8	6	2	Genome Res. (Hoffman et al. 2010)
44	9	4	3	2	Genome Res. (Hoffman et al. 2010)
50	10	5	1	4	Genome Res. (Hoffman et al. 2010)
50	10	5	0	5	Genome Res. (Liu et al. 2010)

^aTwelve scientific papers (16 GO lists) were selected in the following way: the first five were prioritized by a Google search for ‘significant GO terms’ and each of four renowned journal names and the remaining seven were sequentially found in the journal Genome Research by manually searching from 12/2010 back to 5/2010 for GO lists containing more than eight prioritized terms.

^bOnly the reported terms with trackable official GO IDs using AmiGO (Ashburner et al., 2000) version 1.7 were used as the input for GO-Module.