Skip to main content
. 2011 May;55(5):1906–1911. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01645-10

Table 4.

Prevalences of ampC, mexB, and mexY overexpression among isolates showing particular resistance phenotypes

No. (%) of isolates Resistance phenotypea
No. (%) of isolates showing overexpression of:
IMP MER CAZ FEP ampC mexB mexY
190 (100) All All All All 46 (24.2) 24 (12.6) 25 (13.2)
95 (50) S S S S 4 (4.2) 5 (5.3) 2 (2.1)
21 (11.1) R S All All 4 (19.0) 1 (4.8) 4 (19.0)
40 (21.1) R R All All 25 (62.5) 12 (30.0) 13 (32.5)
30 (15.8) All All S R 1 (3.3) 8 (26.7) 13 (43.3)
43 (22.6) All All R R 37 (86.0) 10 (23.3) 8 (18.6)
27 (14.2) R R R R 24 (88.9) 8 (29.6) 8 (29.6)
a

IMP, imipenem; MER, meropenem; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime. “R” phenotypes include CLSI intermediate and resistant categories. Imipenem-sensitive–meropenem-resistant (n = 3) and ceftazidime-susceptible–cefepime-resistant (n = 2) phenotypes were not included in the table due to the nonsignificant number of isolates. “All” indicates all possible phenotypes (S/I/R).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure