1. |
T5 and T6 with apicolateral angles strongly reflexed laterally (Fig. 53) |
Osmia nigriventris (Zetterstedt) |
– |
T5 and T6 with apicolateral angles not or only weakly reflexed laterally |
2 |
2. |
Outer margin of gonoforceps preapically with semicircular widening, at this point gonoforceps appearing nearly twice as broad as its narrowest width (Figs 45, 49, 50, 64) [xanthomelana species group] |
3 |
– |
Outer margin of gonoforceps preapically not or only weakly widened, at this point gonoforceps at most little broader than at its narrowest width (Figs 26, 30, 31) [inermis species group] |
4 |
3. |
Flagellar segments on ventral surface with hairs microscopic; S2 with midapical margin not emarginate |
Osmia nearctica Rightmyer, Griswold, & Arduser, sp. n. |
– |
Flagellar segments on ventral surface with sparse hairs, their length about half the flagellar segment width; S2 with midapical edge weakly emarginate |
Osmia maritima Friese (based on observed palearctic material only) |
4. |
S4 with hooked bristles both along apical margin and on premarginal area, along apical margin the bristles oriented horizontally and on premarginal area directed increasingly vertically (Figs 24, 25) |
Osmia aquilonaria Rightmyer, Griswold, & Arduser, sp. n. |
– |
S4 with midapical hairs unmodified, without hooked bristles (Figs 60, 61) |
5 |
5. |
S4 with apical margin truncate, medially with strong emargination and distinct, rounded lobes lateral to emargination (Fig. 60); declining basal portion of T1 densely shagreened, only with a silky luster |
Osmia inermis (Zetterstedt) |
– |
S4 with apical margin more or less evenly convex, lacking strong emargination at midpoint and distinct sublateral lobes (Fig. 61); declining basal portion of T1 shining, at most superficially shagreened in small areas |
Osmia laticeps Thomson |