Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 24;20(5):390–396. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040824

Table 1.

Classification of priority grade according to index

Acute Urgent Non-urgent Total
n % n % n % %
Acute
 Case 1 (n=83) 53 64 29 35 1 1 100
 Case 7 (n=83) 82 99 1 1 0 0 100
 Case 16 (n=82) 66 81 16 20 0 0 100
 Case 18 (n=82) 67 82 15 18 0 0 100
Urgent
 Case 3 (n=82) 19 23 53 65 10 12 100
 Case 4 (n=83) 8 9 56 68 19 23 100
 Case 5 (n=82) 28 34 53 65 1 1 100
 Case 9 (n=83) 10 12 66 80 7 8 100
 Case 12 (n=83) 6 7 65 78 12 14 100
 Case 14 (n=82) 26 32 54 66 2 2 100
 Case 19 (n=81) 11 14 65 80 5 6 100
 Case 20 (n=81) 6 7 70 86 5 6 100
Non-urgent
 Case 2 (n=83) 1 1 3 4 79 95 100
 Case 6 (n=82) 0 0 1 1 81 99 100
 Case 8 (n=83) 0 0 32 39 51 61 100
 Case 10 (n=83) 0 0 4 5 79 95 100
 Case 11 (n=83) 0 0 1 1 82 99 100
 Case 13 (n=82) 2 2 37 45 43 52 100
 Case 15 (n=82) 0 0 21 26 61 74 100
 Case 17 (n=82) 4 5 22 27 56 68 100

Results are shown as numbers and percentages. Bold numbers indicate the percentage of correct classifications.