Table 6.
Less Variability in RNFL Measures Are Noted after Appropriate Transverse Scaling Is Computed for Each Eye
| Scan Path | Without Vessel Compensation |
With Vessel Compensation |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Thickness (μm) | COV (%) | Global Area (μm2) | COV (%) | Global Thickness (μm) | COV (%) | Global Area (μm2) | COV (%) | |
| 300 | 148.7 | 8.1 | 848628 | 8.4 | 135.1 | 8.2 | 771566 | 8.8 |
| 350 | 140.9 | 7.6 | 849681 | 8.1 | 128.2 | 7.9 | 772506 | 8.6 |
| 400 | 134.3 | 7.4 | 851540 | 7.8 | 121.9 | 8.0 | 772659 | 8.4 |
| 450 | 128.1 | 7.2 | 852310 | 7.8 | 116.4 | 7.4 | 774132 | 8.1 |
| 500 | 123.0 | 6.6 | 857253 | 7.5 | 111.5 | 7.2 | 777299 | 8.1 |
| 550 | 117.7 | 6.9 | 856979 | 7.6 | 106.5 | 7.5 | 775311 | 8.3 |
| 600 | 113.3 | 6.4 | 860773 | 7.3 | 102.6 | 6.8 | 779986 | 7.6 |
| 12° | 115.2 | 11.0 | 846114 | 7.5 | 105.3 | 11.0 | 773221 | 7.9 |
Data for elliptical scans 300 to 600 μm from the rim margin and the standard 12° circular scan.