|
Tan 63
|
2004 |
51 |
80 |
On a 9-point scale, 0 was considered to be nil; 1-3 was considered to be mild; 4-6 was considered to moderate; 7-9 was considered to be strong. Only unequivocal cytoplasmic staining was regarded as positive. |
|
Boland 19
|
2004 |
187 |
67 |
On a 3-point scale, a score of at least 2. Expression was based on the extent and intensity of epithelial cell staining. |
|
Perrone 20
|
2005 |
49 |
87.8 |
On a 12-point scale for immunoreactivity, an immunohistochemistry score of 9-12 was considered strong, 5-8 was considered moderate, 1-4 was considered weak, and 0 was considered negative. |
|
Gauthier 62
|
2005 |
30 |
60.7 |
No cut-off value was mentioned in the paper. |
|
Barnes 54
|
2006 |
161 |
72 |
Score of at least 2. |
|
Gauthier 45
|
2007 |
70 |
55.7 |
Allred score of at least 2. |
|
Kulkarni 21
|
2008 |
69 |
45.8 |
Cytoplasmic granular staining in more than 10% of tumor cells. |
|
Bundred 30
|
2010 |
90 |
58 |
A minimum of 500 cells was investigated across randomly selected areas of DCIS at a magnification of x 400 using a grid graticule and cell counter for each of the two sections. All cases were ER-positive DCIS. |
|
de la Torre 64
|
2010 |
52 |
53 |
On a 3-point scale, a score of at least 2. |
|
Kerlikowske 24
|
2010 |
329 |
44.4 |
On a 3-point scale, a score of at least 2. |