Table 5.
Percentages of abstainers and 95%CI for true and estimated drinking status for “dropouts” in the simulation
| t1 (n = 188) | t2 (n = 253) | t3 (n = 328) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage 95%CI | Precisiona | Percentage 95%CI | Precisiona | Percentage 95%CI | Precisiona | |
| True | 4.3 | — | 4.3 | — | 3.7 | — |
| 2.2–8.2 | 2.4–7.6 | 2.1–6.3 | ||||
| LVCF | 3.2 | = | 2.8 | = | 5.2 | = |
| 1.5–6.8 | 1.3–5.6 | 3.3–8.1 | ||||
| Hotdeck | 4.8 | ≠ | 4.3 | ≠ | 2.9 | ≠ |
| 1.3–8.3 | 2.2–6.4 | 0.6–5.2 | ||||
| Heckman | 4.8 | = | 2.4 | = | 7.3 | ≠ |
| 2.5–8.8 | 1.1–5.1 | 5.0–10.7 | ||||
| MICE | 4.6 | = | 2.7 | = | 3.5 | = |
| 3.1–6.1 | 1.0–4.4 | 0–7.4 | ||||
| BUGS | 4.5 | = | 5.1 | = | 3.1 | = |
| 3.6–5.3 | 3.9–6.4 | 2.5–3.7 | ||||
a
It was checked if more than 5% of people were misclassified (≠) compared to true value or not (=).