Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 18;39(9):3928–3938. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1312

Table 2.

The sequence motifs associated with each defect

Simulation Disruption type Sequence Bend Roll
65A(−1) Bubble GCTATC
65A(−1) Bubble AGGTG
65B(−1) Bubble GTGCAAT
65B(−1) Bubble GATAT
65B(−1) Wrinkle T C_T T_A T
65B(0) Type II kink CTA 80° −76°
65C(0) Type II kink CAA 85° −81°
65C(0) Type I kink GC 95° −92°
65A(+1) Bubble CAATG
65A(+1) Type II kink CAA 67° −64°
65B(+1) Bubble TATC
65B(+1) Type II kink (Bubble) GGTG 108° −102°
104A(−1.5) Bubble CGAACAA
104A(−1.5) Bubble TATC
104A(−1.5) Wrinkle C A_G G
104B(−0.5) Wrinkle T C_A_G G
110A(−1) Type II kink TCG 114°

For defects involving broken base pairs, the identity of the intact base pair either side of the denatured region is also provided. For wrinkled sequences the under-wound steps have been indicated by underlining. Bending and roll angles are listed for the kink defects where appropriate.