Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2010 Nov 18;51(5):1105–1116. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02938.x

Table 1.

Proportion of samples positive using manufacturers’ designations or suggested assay cutoffs

Never pregnant (n=268)a Ever pregnant (n=257) a
Assay Method Class I and II positive Class I only positive Class II only positive Any HLA Ab positive Class I and II positive Class I only positive Class II only positive Any HLA Ab positive
GTI QuickStep ELISA 1 (0.4%) 2 (0.7%) 2 (0.7%) 5 (1.9%) 14 (5.4%) 24 (9.3%) 11 (4.3%) 49 (19.1%)
One Lambda LATM20 ELISA 1 (0.4%) 6 (2.2%) 1 (0.4%) 8 (3.0%) 11 (4.3%) 22 (8.6%) 17 (6.6%) 50 (19.5%)
3Ti Aegis Flow cytometry 1 (0.4%) 14 (5.2%) 2 (0.7%) 17 (6.3%) 29 (11.3%) 27 (10.5%) 19 (7.4%) 75 (29.3%)
Tepnel Lifescreen Luminex 3 (1.2%) 9 (3.5%) 22 (8.5%) 34 (13.1%) 39 (15.7%) 30 (12.1%) 25 (10.1%) 94 (37.9%)
One Lambda LABScreen Mixedb Luminex 20 (7.5%) 39 (14.6%) 19 (7.1%) 78 (29.1%) 64 (19.2%) 54 (16.2%) 17 (5.1%) 135 (52.5%)
a

Samples missing HLA antibody screen data: GTI class I and II, never pregnant = 1; Tepnel class I and II, ever pregnant= 9 (high background signal was obtained); 3Ti class I and II, ever pregnant= 1 (QNS).

b

NBG ratio of 2.2 was the manufacturer’s suggested cutoffs for the organ transplantation field.