Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2010 Nov 23;51(5):921–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02948.x

Table 5.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the association between PSC lens opacity and donor status.

Model number Covariates included in model Reference group Odds ratio* Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P
1 Age Per year 1.115 1.035 1.201 0.004
Donor type Platelet 2.822 0.829 9.608 0.097
2 Age Per year 1.119 1.038 1.206 0.003
Donor type Platelet 2.870 0.837 9.840 0.094
Alcohol intake < 1.5 oz per day 0.364 0.042 3.113 0.356
3 Age Per year 1.116 1.035 1.203 0.004
Donor type Platelet 2.887 0.838 9.942 0.093
Body mass index <26 0.438 0.135 1.420 0.169
4 Age Per year 1.117 1.037 1.203 0.004
Donor type Platelet 2.855 0.830 9.827 0.096
Ocular risk factor index None 2.464 0.674 9.008 0.173
5 Age Per year 1.121 1.039 1.209 0.003
Donor type Platelet 3.096 0.893 10.734 0.075
Sex Male 1.917 0.590 6.234 0.279
*

Adjusted for all other covariates in the model. An odds ratio >1 indicates that the potential risk factor (versus the reference category) has a higher risk of PSC lens opacity. For example, after adjusting for age, granulocyte donors have a higher risk of PSC lens opacity, compared with platelet donors (odds ratio = 2.822, i.e., 282.2% higher in granulocyte donors than in platelet donors), but this risk does not achieve statistical significance (p=0.097).

Number of granulocyte donations <4.

Any history of glaucoma, uveitis, ocular trauma, or ocular surgery (glaucoma surgery or retinal detachment repair).