Table 4.
Bone quantity results
| Alonso et al. [25] a | Dickinson et al. [26] | Herford et al. [27] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone volume | rhBMP2 group | 74.4% | 95% | 71.1% |
| Control group | 80.2% | 63% | 78.1% | |
| Bone height | rhBMP2 group | 10.2 mm (non-cleft side, 15.7 mm) | 85% (vs. roots of adjacent teeth)b | |
| Control group | 13.9 mm (non-cleft side, 16.1 mm) | 70% (vs. roots of adjacent teeth) b | ||
aResults given for Alonso et al. [25] are those of the CT scans performed at 12 months postoperatively
bDickinson et al. [26] presented bone height on a scale from 0–4, 0 representing 0%; one, 25%; two, 50%; three, 75% and four, 100% bone height; the average score on this scale in the article was converted to a percentage for this table