Table 3.

Logistic regressions predicting ethnic labels by setting, ethnicity, and potential mediators

	Heritage		Heritage-Am.		Panethnic		Pan-Am.
	b (SE)	OR	b (SE)	OR	b (SE)	OR	b (SE)	OR
Block 1
Setting	.64 (.08)	1.90***	−.84 (.10)	.43***	.31 (10)	1.36**	−.28 (.11)	.75**
Ethnicity	.13 (.08)	1.13†	.02 (.09)	1.08	−.36 (.10)	.70***	.30 (.10)	1.35**
Block 2
Setting	.60 (.08)	1.82***	−.64 (.11)	.53***	.24 (.10)	1.27*	−.23 (.11)	.80*
Ethnicity	.25 (.08)	1.28**	.07 (.10)	1.07	−.33 (.10)	.72***	.28 (.11)	1.32*
Generation	−.55 (.09)	.58***	.47 (.12)	1.60***	−.24 (.11)	.79*	.82 (.17)	2.28***
English	−.07 (.09)	.93	.49 (.16)	1.63**	−.11 (.10)	.90	.22 (.18)	1.25
Heritage Lang.	.10 (.08)	1.11	.10 (.10)	1.10	−.02 (.10)	.98	−.04 (.11)	.97
Centrality	.29 (.12)	1.34*	−.14 (.13)	.87	−.19 (.14)	.83	−.07 (.16)	.94
Regard	.14 (.14)	1.15	−.18 (.16)	.84	−.05(.17)	.96	.11 (.20)	1.12
Predictability (%)	68.3		77.2		83.2		86.2
Predicted n	362		217		156		133

Setting was coded LA = −1, NC = 1. Ethnicity was coded Latino = −1, Asian = 1. Generation was coded first generation = −1, second generation = 1. OR = odds ratio

† p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001