Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2011 May;69(5 Pt 1):401–405. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182125f7f

Table 2.

ROC analysis for ETCO2 corresponding to return of audible heart rate > 60 bpm

ETCO2 cut off value (mmHg) 12 13 14 15
Sensitivity (%) 100% 95% 92% 73%
Specificity (%) 68% 78% 81% 96%
False Negative(%) 0% 4% 6% 24%
False Positive (%) 22% 15% 13% 2%
Likelihood Ratio 3.20 4.35 4.95 23.62
Distance (d) 0.486 0.519 0.524 0.499
Correct predictions (%) 86% 87% 88% 84%