Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2011 Mar 25;13(8):1924–1927. doi: 10.1021/ol2002418

Allene Functionalization via Bicyclic Methylene Aziridines

Luke A Boralsky 1, Dagmara Marston 1, R David Grigg 1, John C Hershberger 1, Jennifer M Schomaker 1,*
PMCID: PMC3090038  NIHMSID: NIHMS284123  PMID: 21438516

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-284123-f0001.jpg

The oxidative functionalization of olefins is a common method for the formation of vicinal carbon-heteroatom bonds. However, oxidative methods to transform allenes into synthetic motifs containing three contiguous carbon-heteroatom bonds are much less developed. This paper describes the use of bicyclic methylene aziridines (MAs), prepared via intramolecular allene aziridination, as scaffolds for functionalization of all three allene carbons.


Olefins are popular substrates for a host of oxidative transformations designed to introduce new C-N bonds into molecules.1 However, considerably less effort has been devoted to oxidations of allenes, despite the potential to efficiently generate three new contiguous heteroatom-bearing chiral centers.2,3 Herein, we describe our preliminary efforts to utilize intramolecular allene amination as a key step for the stereoselective and flexible functionalization of allenes.3

One proposed approach towards this goal is illustrated in Scheme 1. Reaction of an intermediate bicyclic methylene aziridine (MA) 2 with a nucleophile would generate enecarbamate 3. Sequential addition of an electrophile and a hydride source to reduce the resultant imine could flexibly generate motifs such as 4.3a,4

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Proposed allene functionalization.

Despite the great potential of bicyclic MAs to serve as scaffolds for allene oxidation, a significantly more detailed understanding of their preparation and reactivity is needed.4 A recent report on allene aziridination utilizing N-tosyloxycarbamates as nitrene precursors reported low yields of MAs and limited substrate scope.3a Thus, our first challenge was to examine factors including substrate, nitrene precursor, catalyst and oxidant identity to improve the efficiency of allene aziridination to synthetically useful levels and reasonable stereoselectivities.

Attempts to utilize N-tosyloxycarbamates as nitrene precursors were met with limited success for the synthesis of 7 (Table 1, entries 1–4), similar to previously reported results.3a The competitive formation of C-H amination product 8 was a recurring issue, as well as unproductive tosylation of 5 with another molecule of itself to yield 9.5 The use of sulfamate 6 was successful and gave no competing C-H amination, but ring-opening of the labile MA to 10 (entry 5) was problematic. Increasing the tether length between the allene and the sulfamate to three carbons (11, entry 6) completely suppressed ring-opening of the desired 11a, but also gave significant amounts of the C-H amination product 11b.

Table 1.

N-Tosyloxycarbamate and sulfamate precursors.

graphic file with name nihms-284123-t0002.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-284123-t0003.jpg
a

K2CO3, 0.1 M in acetone.

b

Substrate was added over 2 h and the acetone was dried over 4 A MS.

c

2.0 equiv PhIO, 4 A MS, CH2CI2, rt.

d

Products of hydrolysis of 10 were also observed.

e

2.0 equiv PhI(OAc)2, MgO, CH2CI2, 40 °C.

For the purposes of isolating the target MAs, we found that carbamates provided the best balance between the reactivity of the nitrene precursor and the subsequent stability and reactivity of the product.6 A series of allenic carbamates were subjected to various reaction conditions as illustrated in Table 2. We found that the Rh2(OAc)4 and Rh2(oct)4 (oct = O2CC7H15) catalysts previously used in this type of chemistry did not perform well in our hands.3a,b Rh2esp2 (esp = α,α,α',α'-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionate) and Rh2(TPA)4 (TPA = triphenylacetate) proved to be more effective catalysts, giving complete conversion of the carbamate in most cases. The choice of oxidant was also crucial, as the leaving group released from the PhI(OAc)2 or PhI(OPiv)2 oxidants can ring-open sensitive MAs to yield the corresponding enecarbamates. For example (Table 2, entry 1), the Z isomer of MA 12a was susceptible to ring-opening by pivalate to give 12b in addition to the desired 12a. Placing a methyl group at the carbon α to the allene (entry 2) suppressed ring-opening to give an 87% yield of MA 13a as a 2.4:1 mixture of E:Z isomers at the olefin, with the methyl group and the aziridine proton maintaining a trans relationship in both alkene stereoisomers as observed by 1H NMR. The use of PhIO in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves minimized the MA ring-opening and was the oxidant of choice for most of the reactions in Table 2.

Table 2.

Carbamate precursors for allene aziridination.

graphic file with name nihms-284123-t0004.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-284123-t0005.jpg

A: Rh2(esp)2, 2.0 equiv PhI(OAc)2, 2.6 equiv MgO, CH2CI2, 35 °C

B: Rh2(esp)2, 2.0 equiv PhI(OPiv)2, 2.6 equiv MgO, CH2CI2, 35 °C

C: Rh2(esp)2, 2.0 equiv PhIO, 4 A MS, CH2CI2, rt

D: Rh2(TPA)4, 2.0 equiv PhIO, 4 A MS, CH2CI2, rt

a

Based on recovered starting material.

b

None of the Z was isolated.

Competing C-H amination can occur when the tether between the allene and the carbamate is two or more carbons. As illustrated in entry 3, the nature of the catalyst and oxidant influenced the aziridination vs. C-H amination ratio and the overall yield of the reaction. A Rh2esp2 catalyst with PhI(OAc)2 (Condition A) gave good conversion to a mixture of 14a and 14b, but with no selectivity for azirdination over C-H amination. Changing the oxidant to PhI(OPiv)2 (Condition B) improved the E:Z ratio of the MA product from 1.5:1 to 4.1:1, but did not increase the ratio of 14a:14b. Switching the oxidant to PhIO (Condition C) increased the ratio of 14a:14b to 4:1, with a 66% yield of the MA. Finally, changing the catalyst to Rh2(TPA)4 resulted in a 5.3:1 ratio of 14a:14b, with an 80% yield of the desired MA 14a (condition D). Changing the side chain on the allene in combination with the use of Rh2(TPA)4 as the catalyst gave only the isolated E isomer (entries 4 and 6), but C-H amination was competitive. Placement of alkyl groups at positions α or β to the allene resulted in increased amounts of C-H amination products (entries 7–9), although the use of Rh2(TPA)4 did improve the aziridination:C-H amination ratio to some extent. Finally, shutting down the possibility of C-H amination (entry 10) gave an excellent 94% yield of the desired MA 21a.

The E:Z ratios of the MAs in Table 2 also deserve comment. NOESY 1D studies suggest that the E olefin geometry is present in the major product (see the SI for further details). Indirect evidence that interactions between the nitrenoid intermediate and the alkyl chain play a role in determining the E:Z ratio is suggested by entry 3 in Table 2. The more sterically demanding Rh2(TPA)4 complex increased the E:Z ratio from 1.5:1 to around 4:1. Further studies are underway to increase the bulk of the Rh ligands to improve the stereoselectivity of the aziridination.

The reactions in Table 2 represent the first reliable methods to access bicyclic MAs bearing electron-withdrawing groups on the aziridine nitrogen. The next step was to determine what types of nucleophiles would yield the necessary enecarbamate (Scheme 1, 3) intermediate via aziridine ring-opening. We expected the additional ring strain present in 14a might allow for milder conditions than would typically be expected for aziridine ring opening (Scheme 2).7 Indeed, carboxylic acid nucleophiles gave the enecarbamates 22 and 26 in excellent yields, while the use of TMSCl at rt gave 24 in good yield. We hypothesized that since MA ring-opening using carboxylic acids as nucleophiles was so facile, Lewis acids might also activate the aziridine towards ring-opening with neutral nucleophiles. Indeed, the use of Sc(OTf)3 as a mild Lewis acid in the presence of methanol and thiophenol promoted the ring-opening of 14a to give 27 and 28 in modest yields. No reaction occurred in the absence of the Lewis acid. Reaction with a cyanide nucleophile was also improved in the presence of a Lewis acid, although the double bond migrated to give an isomeric enecarbamate 25. Finally, treatment of 14a with NaN3/TMSCl generated 23 in 82% yield, likely via initial ring-opening of the MA, followed by a [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement.8

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Nucleophilic ring opening of bicyclic MAs.

Based on the results in Scheme 2, we felt that carboxylic acids were the most promising nucleophiles to pursue for further studies. As illustrated in entry 1 of Scheme 3, eliminating the ring-opening step and simply treating the MA 14a with NBS in a mixture of THF/H2O gave 29 with an initial dr of 5.5:1. Not surprisingly, the α-bromoketone epimerized slowly over time to give a 1.1:1 mixture of diastereomers. Loss of stereochemical integrity was also noted when 26 was subjected to similar conditions, giving the tetrasubstituted bromoalkene 30 as a 2.3:1 mixture of E:Z isomers (entry 2). We postulated that isomerization of an intermediate imine was leading to the brominated olefin. This prompted us to add NaCNBH3 as a reductant to the reaction mixture, whereupon 31 was obtained in 73% yield with a dr of 10:1 (see SI for details and a proposed stereochemical model). It is possible that anchimeric assistance from the acetate group of the enecarbamate is playing a role in controlling the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. This result, coupled with the ease of ring-opening MAs with acids, is an exciting step towards flexible, stereoselective methods for allene functionalization. The power of allene aziridination to generate multiple carbon-heteroatom bonds in a single pot was further demonstrated by a tandem aziridination/ring-opening of the allene 13 to 32 (entry 4). The substrate was treated under Condition B (Table 2) to form the intermediate MA. N-aminophthalimide and additional oxidant were then added to the same pot to yield the unusual spiroaminal 32 in 46% yield, where four new carbon-heteroatom bonds have been formed in a single pot. The stereochemistry between the Me and OAc groups at a and b was exclusively trans by 1H NMR (see SI for further details). The 2.4:1 E:Z ratio of the MA olefin isomers (see 13a, Table 2, entry 2) appears to have been translated from the intermediate MA into a 2.4:1 dr in the final product 32. This result suggests that better control of the E:Z stereochemistry in the MA formation will translate into excellent dr in the spiroaminal products.

In conclusion, we have described a synthetically viable approach towards bicyclic MAs activated by electron-withdrawing groups. The potential of these MAs as scaffolds for the construction of motifs bearing three contiguous heteroatom-bearing carbons has been demonstrated. Future work is directed towards expansion of the substrate scope, particularly in the use of different nitrene precursors to minimize competing C-H amination. The asymmetric syntheses of MAs from enantioenriched allenes9 and their subsequent reactivity will be further explored. The scope of nucleophiles and electrophiles for efficient and flexible multi-component reactions that install multiple carbon-heteroatom bonds into a simple allene precursor will be expanded.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Table 3.

Formation of three contiguous carbon-heteroatom bonds from allenes via bicyclic methylene aziridines.

graphic file with name nihms-284123-t0006.jpg
a

Compound epimerized to a 1.1:1 mixture upon standing.

Acknowledgment

Funding was provided by the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Alan Meis and Cale Weatherly (UW-Madison) are thanked for help in the preparation of allene substrates. Dr. Charles Fry (UW-Madison) is thanked for assistance with NMR spectroscopy and Professors Hans Reich and Steven Burke (UW-Madison) for insightful comments. DM was supported by the NIH (Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant, GM08505). The NMR facilities at UW-Madison are funded by the NSF (CHE-9208463, CHE-9629688) and NIH (RR08389-01).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures and full characterizations are available for all new compounds.

References

  • 1.For selected reviews on the aziridination of olefins, see: Pellissier H. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:1509.. Sweeney JB. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002;31:247. doi: 10.1039/b006015l.. Yudin AK, editor. Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. . Muller P, Fruit C. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2905. doi: 10.1021/cr020043t.
  • 2.For selected references on C-O bond-forming reactions with allenes, see: Katukojvala S, Barlett KN, Lotesta SD, Williams LJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:15348. doi: 10.1021/ja044563c.. Ghosh P, Lotesta SD, Williams LJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:2438. doi: 10.1021/ja068813w.. Lotesta SD, Kiren S, Sauers RR, Williams LJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:7108. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701401.. Ghosh P, Cusick JR, Inghrim J, Williams LJ. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4672. doi: 10.1021/ol901948d.
  • 3.(a) Robertson J, Feast GC, White LV, Steadman VA, Claridge TDW. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010;8:3060. doi: 10.1039/c003693e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu R. Ph.D. Dissertation. Brigham Young University; 2007. [Google Scholar]; (c) Atkinson RS, Malpass JR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975:4305. [Google Scholar]; (d) Bingham EM, Gilbert JC. J. Org. Chem. 1975;40:224. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shipman M. Synlett. 2006:3205. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hayes CJ, Beavis PW, Humphries LA. Chem. Commun. 2006:4501. doi: 10.1039/b611662k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Padwa A, Flick AC, Leverett CA, Stengel T. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:6377. doi: 10.1021/jo048990k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lebel H, Huard K, Lectard S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14198. doi: 10.1021/ja0552850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Espino CG, Du Bois J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:598. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010202)40:3<598::AID-ANIE598>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lebel H, Huard K, Lectard S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14198. doi: 10.1021/ja0552850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Espino CG, Wehn PM, Chow J, Du Bois J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:6935. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu XE. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:2701. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Feldman AK, Colasson B, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:13444. doi: 10.1021/ja050622q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) VanderWerf CA, Heasley VL. J. Org. Chem. 1966;31:3534. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Ogasawara M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2009;20:259. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim H, Williams LJ. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. 2006;11:870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES