Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 23;80(2):574–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.028

Table 1. Relative tumor growth with respect to treatment.

Relative tumor volume (RTV)
Group Day 3 Day 7 Day 14
Control 2.33 ± 0.55 2.84 ± 0.81
CA4P 1.11 ± 0.14a 3.33 ± 0.45
Radiation (IR) 1.28 ± 0.12a 2.00 ± 0.23 2.83 ± 0.88
IR + O2 1.04 ± 0.14a 1.80 ± 0.35a 3.49 ± 0.87
CA4P + 24h IR 1.01 ± 0.11a 1.79 ± 0.29a 2.89 ± 0.45
IR + 1h CA4P 1.46 ± 0.22a 2.10 ± 0.23 2.14 ± 0.35
(IR + O2) + 1h CA4P 1.02 ± 0.11a 1.20 ± 0.08a,b 2.35 ± 0.42
CA4P + 24h (IR + O2) 0.96 ± 0.05a,b 0.60 ± 0.20a,b 1.51 ± 0.25c
a

p < 0.05 from control;

b

p < 0.05 from IR group;

c

p < 0.05 from any of the other treatment groups (Student's t-test).

The animals in Control and CA4P alone were sacrificed on Day 7. CA4P was administered as a single dose of 30 mg/kg. IR was delievered as a single dose 5 Gy.