Skip to main content
. 2011 May 28;5(Suppl 2):S9. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S2-S9

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of statistical methods for discovering significant reactions in simulated datasets. Four methods are evaluated: discovering active subnetworks using simulated annealing (Anneal) and greedy search (Greedy) [13], discovering significant individual reactions using Metastats [9], finding differentially abundant KEGGdefined pathways (KEGGPath), and MetaPath. Four datasets are created by varying the number of significant reactions n and their significances.