Table 2. Explanation of the compatibility relationship using the lock-key-model.
wTei | wRi | wHa | wNo | wMel | wCer2 | |||||||
factor | mod | resc | mod | resc | mod | resc | mod | resc | mod | resc | mod | resc |
1 | L | K | L | K | L | K | L | K | ||||
2 | L | K | L | K | ? | |||||||
3 | K | L | K | L | K | ? | ||||||
4 | K | L | K | L | K | ? | ||||||
5 | L | K | ? |
Presence of locks is indicated by âLâ, presence of keys âKâ, unknown relationships by question mark. A strain rescues another strain if all its keys match the other's locks.