Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2010 Dec 1;4(4):1749–1773. doi: 10.1214/10-AOAS357

Table 4.

Accuracy comparison of three methods for various CNV sizes. All accuracy indexes are listed as percentages. The average tuning parameters used in the fused lasso were λ1 =0.13 (0.04) and λ2 = 0.77 (0.22); standard deviations appear in parentheses. For DPI, the 3-fold cross-validation accuracy indexes are averages over the leftover thirds; initial values of average LogR for each copy number state: μ0 = −5.5923, μ1 = −0.6313, μ2 = −0.0045, μ3 = 0.3252

PennCNV
Fused Lasso
DPI
CNV size CNV type TPR FPR FDR TPR FPR FDR TPR FPR FDR
5 Del 83.80 0.0017 4.92 76.67 0.0202 40.66 76.67 0.0006 1.88
Dup 58.53 0.0011 4.67 00.33 0.0065 98.05 53.60 0.0003 1.28
10 Del 95.03 0.0011 1.45 94.23 0.0130 15.21 89.37 0.0005 0.77
Dup 93.43 0.0006 0.78 26.00 0.0128 39.01 92.30 0.0006 0.89
20 Del 94.63 0.0008 0.58 96.97 0.0159 09.62 89.87 0.0016 1.15
Dup 96.13 0.0014 0.92 74.93 0.0126 09.86 95.50 0.0011 0.76
30 Del 94.57 0.00130.62 0.28 96.76 0.0156 06.53 94.73 0.0013 0.62
Dup 96.09 0.0001 0.05 85.84 0.0173 08.02 95.39 0.0012 0.55
40 Del 97.83 0.0018 0.59 98.33 0.0158 04.94 98.46 0.0006 0.19
Dup 94.61 0.0014 0.46 87.88 0.0181 06.24 94.66 0.42 0.42
50 Del 94.33 0.0003 0.07 95.49 0.0162 04.21 93.82 0.0010 0.26
Dup 94.50 0.0003 0.09 91.06 0.0121 03.33 95.03 0.0011 0.30
Overall 94.42 0.0009 0.49 88.00 0.0147 07.73 93.70 0.0009 0.50