Table 4.
Correlates | Previous Screening | Statistic | |||
Age (years) | No [N (%)] | Yes [N (%)] | Total [N (%)] | ||
< 30 | 84 (94.4) | 5 (5.6) | 89 (100.0) | ||
>= 30 | 108 (83.1) | 22 (16.9) | 130 (100.0) | X2 6.25, 1 df, p=0.012 | |
Total | 192 (87.7) | 27 (12.3) | 219 (100.0) | ||
Own Risk | |||||
No opinion | 81(89.0) | 10 (11.0) | 91 (100.0) | ||
No risk | 70 (89.7) | 8 (10.3) | 78 (100.0) | X2 1.95, 2 df, p=0.399 | |
Own risk | No [N (%)] | Yes [N (%)] | Total [N (%)] | ||
At risk | 41 (82.0) | 9 (18.0) | 50 (100.0) | ||
Total | 192 (87.7) | 27 (12.3) | 219 (100.0) | ||
Perceived need for Screening | |||||
Yes | 70 (90.9) | 7 (9.1) | 77 (100.0) | ||
No | 122 (85.4) | 20 (14.1) | 142 (100.0) | X2 1.15, 1df, p=0.283 | |
Total | 192 (87.7) | 27 (12.3) | 219 (100.0) | ||
Contraceptive Ever-use | |||||
No | 36 (90.0) | 4 (10.0) | 40 (100.0) | ||
Yes | 156 (87.2) | 23 (12.7) | 179 (100.0) | X2 0.25, 1 df, p=0.620 | |
Total | 192 (87.7) | 27 (12.3) | 219 (100.0) | ||
Parity | |||||
0 – 1 | 38 (95.0) | 2 (5.0) | 40 (100.0) | X2 2.43, 1 df, p=0.119 | |
>= 2 | 154 (86.0) | 25 (14.0) | 179 (100.0) | ||
Total | 192 (87.7) | 27 (12.3 | 219 (100.0) |