Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;11(1):2–15.

Table 1.

General characteristic of the study population stratified by drug and gender

Parameters HIV Patients Male Patients Female Patients

HAART naïve On HAART HAART naïve On HAART HAART naïve On HAART
Age (yrs) 33.42 ± 0.88 36.91 ± 0.77** 36.68 ± 2.15 39.63 ± 1.68 32.17 ± 0.89 36.10 ± 0.85§§
WT (kg) 48.93 ± 1.24 54.92 ± 3.61* 54.08 ± 2.44 75.50 ± 2.50†† 47.00 ± 1.34‡‡ 51.18 ± 3.04##
CD4 (cell mm-3) 272.60 ± 13.24 315.30 ± 13.92* 251.60 ± 26.40 277.70 ± 29.85 295.50 ± 17.33 326.30±15.78
CD3 (cell mm-3) 1243.00 ± 43.55 1216.00 ± 45.19 1251.00 ± 89.33 1148.00 ± 92.36 1276.00 ± 56.32 1238.00 ±
52.08
TWBC (x 103 µl−1) 5.19 ± 0.18 4.39 ± 0.12** 5.53 ± 0.41 4.32 ± 0.24 5.14 ± 0.23 4.41 ±
0.14§
TLC (x 103 µl−1) 2.81 ± 0.09 2.73 ± 0.08 2.86± 0.21 2.48 ± 0.18 2.79 ± 0.12 2.79 ± 0.09
LC (%) 55.48 ± 1.03 62.49 ± 1.00*** 53.79 ± 2.18 57.72 ± 2.57 55.97 ± 1.38 63.77 ±
1.05§§§,#
RBC (x 106 µl−1) 3.55 ± 0.04 3.31 ± 0.05*** 3.67 ± 0.11 3.51 ± 0.09 3.51 ± 0.05 3.25 ±
0.05§§§,#
HB (g dl−1) 9.80 ± 0.12 10.59 ± 0.15 10.59 ± 0.29 11.54 ± 0.33 9.45 ± 0.13‡‡‡ 10.33 ±
0.16§§§,###
PCV (%) 32.64 ± 0.48 35.68 ± 0.55*** 35.19 ± 1.19 38.00 ± 0.10 31.33 ± 0.52‡‡‡ 35.06 ±
0.63§§§,###
MCV (fL) 93.02 ± 0.94 110.50 ± 1.33*** 96.32 ± 2.30 112.5 ± 2.79††† 90.99 ± 1.11‡ 109.90±
1.51§§§
MCH (pg) 27.92 ± 0.27 32.60 ± 0.50*** 29.61 ± 0.66 33.51 ± 0.81††† 27.19 ± 0.31‡‡‡ 32.35 ±
0.59§§§
MCHC (g dl−1) 30.30 ± 0.25 29.66 ± 0.40 31.10 ± 0.65 29.95 ± 0.49 30.17 ± 0.31 29.58 ± 0.48
RDW (%) 20.88 ± 0.50 18.64 ± 0.52 21.91 ± 1.39 17.26 ± 0.59 20.73 ± 0.59 18.98 ± 0.63§
PLT (x 103 µl−1) 174.40 ± 7.20 148.80 ± 6.07* 178.5 ± 18.82 163.1 ± 14.09 178.10 ± 8.29 144.90 ±
6.69§§
MPV (fL) 11.25 ± 0.22 11.88 ± 0.20* 11.30 ± 0.48 11.80 ± 0.32 10.99 ± 0.27 11.90 ± 0.25§

Results are presented as means ± SEM. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001 indicates the level of significance when the HAART naïve were compared to those on HAART (unpaired t-test); P ≤ 0.05, ††P ≤ 0.01, †††P ≤ 0.001 indicates the level of significance when the male HAART naïve were compared to the male on HAART; §P ≤ 0.05, §§P ≤ 0.01, §§§P ≤ 0.001 indicates the level of significance when the female HAART naïve were compared to the female on HAART; P ≤ 0.05, ‡‡P ≤ 0.01, ‡‡‡P ≤ 0.001 indicates the level of significance when the male HAART naïve were compared to the female HAART naïve; #P ≤ 0.05, ##P ≤ 0.01, ###P ≤ 0.001 indicates the level of significance when the male on HAART were compared to the female on HAART.