Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 26;2011:215764. doi: 10.1155/2011/215764

Table 3.

Moderators and outcome variables in individual studies included in the meta-analysis.

Study (ref.) Number of patients (ID/C) Trial duration (wks) Age (ys) Duration of DM (ys) HbA1c/FPG baseline (%/mmol/L) BMI baseline (Kg/m2) MACE (n,ID/C) All-cause mortality (n,ID/C) Cardiovasc. mortality (n,ID/C)
Albiglutide versus placebo
Rosenstock et al. [19] 128/50 16 54 5 8.0/9.7 32.0 0/3 NR/NR NR/NR

Exenatide versus placebo
Gill et al. [20] 27/25 12 55 NR 7.3/NR NR 0/0 0/0 0/0
Kadowaki et al. [21] 115/40 12 59 11 8.0/9.1 25.9 0/0 0/0 0/0
Zinman et al. [22] 121/112 16 56 8 7.9/8.9 34.0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Gao et al. [23] 234/232 16 55 8 8.3/9.3 26.2 0/1 0/0 0/0
DeFronzo et al. [24] 47/45 20 56 NR 7.9/NR NR 0/0 0/0 0/0
Apovian et al. [25] 96/98 24 55 5 7.6/8.6 33.7 0/0 0/0 0/0
Moretto et al. [26] 155/77 24 54 1 7.8/8.7 31.5 0/0 0/0 0/0
Liutkus et al. [27] 111/54 26 54 6 8.2/9.1 33.5 0/0 0/0 0/0
DeFronzo et al. [28] 223/113 30 53 6 8.2/9.4 34.0 1/2 0/0 0/0
Buse et al. [29] 248/123 30 55 6 8.6/10.3 33.5 1/2 0/0 0/0
Kendall et al. [30] 486/247 30 55 9 8.5/9.9 34.0 7/6 0/1 0/1

Exenatide versus rosiglitazone
DeFronzo#et al. [24] 45/45 20 56 NR 7.9/NR NR 0/0 0/0 0/0
Exenatide versus glibenclamide
Derosa et al. [31] 63/65 52 56 NR 8.8/7.9 28.6 NR/NR 0/0 0/0
Exenatide versus BiAsp 30/70
Bergenstal et al. [32] 124/248 24 52 NR 10.1/11.4 33.8 NR/NR 0/1 0/1
Nauck et al. [33] 253/248 52 58 10 8.6/11.1 30.4 10/5 2/1 1/1

Exenatide versus glargine
Barnett et al. [34] 138/138 16 55 7 8.9/12.0 31.3 0/0 0/0 0/0
NCT00360334 [35] 118/116 26 56 NR 8.6/10.8 34.1 2/2 NR/NR NR/NR
Heine et al. [36] 282/267 26 59 9 8.2/10.2 31.3 5/3 0/0 0/0
Bunck et al. [37] 36/33 52 58 5 7.5/9.1 30.6 NR/NR NR/NR NR/NR
Diamant et al. [38] 233/232 26 58 8 8.3/9.8 32.0 1/0 0/0 0/0

Exenatide versus insulin
Davis et al. [39] 33/16 16 53 11 8.1/8.7 34.0 1/0 0/0 0/0

Exenatide LAR versus placebo
Kim et al. [40] 30/14 15 53 4 8.4/10.7 36.0 0/0 0/0 0/0

Exenatide LAR versus pioglitazone
Bergenstal et al. [41] 160/165 26 52 6 8.5/9.1 32.0 0/3 0/0 0/0

Exenatide LAR versus sitagliptin
Bergenstal et al. [41]# 160/166 26 52 6 8.5/9.1 32.0 0/1 0/1 0/0

Liraglutide versus placebo
Madsbad et al. [42] 135/29 12 57 4 7.5/NR 30.4 0/0 0/0 0/0
Vilsbøll [43] 123/40 14 56 4 8.3/11.8 30.1 0/0 0/0 0/0
Seino et al. [44] 180/46 14 57 8 8.3/NR 23.9 0/0 0/0 0/0
Kaku et al. [45] 176/88 24 60 10 8.4/NR 24.9 1/1 0/0 0/0
Russell-Jones et al. [46] 232/115 26 57 9 8.3/9.2 30.6 5/1 1/2 0/2
Zinman et al. [47] 355/175 26 55 9 8.5/10.1 33.7 1/0 0/0 0/0
Marre et al. [48] 695/114 26 56 6 8.4/9.7 29.7 3/2 0/0 0/0
Nauck et al. [49] 724/121 26 57 7 8.4/10.0 31.2 6/0 1/0 0/0

Liraglutide versus metformin
Feinglos et al. [50] 176/34 12 53 5 7.0/NR 34,5 0/0 0/0 0/0

Liraglutide versus rosiglitazone
Marre#et al. [48] 695/232 26 56 6 8.4/9.7 29.7 3/0 0/0 0/0

Liraglutide versus glimepiride
Madsbad#et al. [42] 135/26 12 57 4 7.5/NR 30.4 0/0 0/0 0/0
NCT00614120 [35] 698/231 16 53 7 NR/NR 25.5 3/2 0/0 0/0
Nauck#et al. [49] 724/121 26 57 7 8.4/10.0 31.2 6/2 1/0 0/0
Garber et al. [51] 498/248 52 53 5 8.3/9.4 33.0 2/2 0/1 0/0

Liraglutide versus glibenclamide
NCT00393718 [35] 268/132 24 58 8 8.3/NR 24.8 4/3 1/0 0/0

Liraglutide versus sitagliptin
Pratley et al. [52] 446/219 26 55 6 8.4/10.0 32.8 1/1 1/1 0/1

Liraglutide versus glargine
Russell-Jones#et al. [46] 232/234 26 57 9 8.3/9.2 30.6 5/1 1/1 0/1

#Studies with multiple comparators; DM: diabetes mellitus; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; MACE: major cardiovascular events; cardiovasc.: cardiovascular; NR: not reported.