. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 9.

Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar 9;7963:79632A–79632A-6. doi: 10.1117/12.878249

Table 1.

Comparison of the myocardial mass estimated using our approach from CTA and that obtained from PET.

Pigs	Estimated Mass (g)	PET Mass (g)	Estimated %LV (%)	PET %LV (%)
Polly	14	16	23	19
Quinn	18	24	25	29
Ursula	12	16	17	19
Rosie	24	20	28	20
Tracy	20	16	25	16
Tammy	18	23	22	26
Velma	15	17	23	20