Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 24;24(6):503–516. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzr006

Table I.

Characteristics of the 1m4w protein designs

AA position WT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 v48 w20 w20v48 SS-type Region
20 W W W W W W R R R R R W W Strand Finger
46 N R R R R R L L L F L L L
48 V F F F V K L W F I V L V
72 N Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N N N Loop
74 Y W F I L L R R R R R R R Strand
87 E S S S S S S S S S S S S Palm
89 Y Y Y Y Y Y H H H H H H H
120 W T T T T T W W W W W W W Thumb
121 R H H H H H R R R R R R R
124 A V V V V V A A A A A A A
133 F H H H H H Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
135 Q S S S S S Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
176 E I I I I I E E E E E E E Finger
# Mutations 0 11 11 11 10 11 7 7 7 7 6 6 5
Ligand lac lac lac lac lac ala ala ala ala ala ala ala
Ebind (r.e.u) 19.9 19.9 19.9 20.2 19.8 17.6 17.4 17.2 17.1 12.9 13.3 15.4
Affinity* (kcal/mol) −7.4 −7.4 −7.4 −7.6 −7.4 −6.2 −6.0 −5.9 −5.9 −3.5 −3.8 −4.9
PDB ID 1M4W 3MF6 3MF9 3MFC 3MFA

Amino acid identities at given sequence positions for wild-type 1m4w plus 12 designed mutants. Designation of each 1m4w_‘X’ protein at top. Gray type denotes mutated amino acids. Secondary structure and protein region of mutations shown at far right. Number of mutations from wild-type, ligand target (d-ala-d-ala or d-ala-d-lac), computed RosettaLigand energy of binding in Rosetta energy units (r.e.u), RosettaLigand predicted affinity (in kcal/mol from the method of Meiler and Baker, 2006) and PDB IDs for the deposited structures are at the bottom.