Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2011 May;36(5):824–835.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.005

Table 7.

Radiographic Parameters at Final Follow-up (Weighted Mean)

VLPS Non-BrEF BrEF PKF CI p value
Volar Tilt (degrees) Primary literature review 3.9 (n=235) 6.5 (n=81) −0.8 (n=169) 3.7 (n=52) −11 (n=220) 0.018
Secondary literature review 3.1 (n=94) - 0.3 (n=35) 0.5 (n=49) −11 (n=168) <0.001
Radial Inclination (degrees) Primary literature review 13.4 (n=149) 13.7 (n=53) 13.9 (n=113) 21 (n=52) 14.8 (n=137) 0.182
Secondary literature review 22.8 (n=94) - 19.5 (n=35) 21 (n=49) 18.0 (n=168) <0.001
Ulnar Variance (mm) Primary literature review 1.5 (n=53) 1.0 (n=53) 1.1 (n=81) 3.0 (n=27) 3.6 (n=143) <0.001
Secondary literature review 1.5 (n=53) - 2.4 (n=35) 3.0 (n=49) 3.6 (n=143) <0.001

Note: p values were calculated using ANOVA.

Significant difference (95% confidential level using Tukey Style Multiple Comparisons test) were found between the following treatment groups for the following variables in the primary literature review: Volar Tilt – VLPS/CI, Non-BrEF/CI; Ulnar Variance – VLPS/BrEF, VLPS/CI, Non-BrEF/CI

Significant difference (95% confidential level using Tukey Style Multiple Comparisons test) were found between the following treatment groups for the following variables in the secondary literature review: Volar Tilt – VLPS/CI, BrEF/CI, PKF/CI; Radial Inclination – all groups were significantly different; Ulnar Variance – All groups significantly different except for BrEF/CI.

The Non-BrEF could not be compared via ANOVA in the secondary literature review to the other groups because only 1 paper was present for analysis.