Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2011 May;36(5):824–835.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.005

Appendix 1.

Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES)

Score each question 0–2 (Higher score indicated higher quality)

Study question
1. Was the relevant background work cited to establish a foundation for the research question?
Study design
2. Was a comparison group used?
3. Was patient status at more than one time point considered?
4. Was data collection performed prospectively?
5. Were patients randomized to groups?
6. Were patients blinded to the extent possible?
7. Were treatment providers blinded to the extent possible?
8. Was an independent evaluator used to administer outcome measures?
Subjects
9. Did sampling procedures minimize sample/selection bias?
10. Were inclusion/exclusion criteria defined?
11. Was an appropriate enrollment contained?
12. Was an appropriate retention/follow-up obtained?
Intervention
13. Was the intervention applied according to established principles?
14. Were biases due to the treatment provider minimized (i.e. attention, training, etc)?
15. Was the intervention compared to appropriate comparator?
Outcomes
16. Was an appropriate primary outcome defined?
17. Were appropriate secondary outcomes considered?
18. Was an appropriate follow-up period incorporated?
Analysis
19. Was an appropriate statistical test(s) performed to indicate differences related to the intervention?
20. Was it established that the study had significant power to identify treatment effects?
21. Was the size and significance of the effects reported?
22. Were missing data accounted for and considered in the analyses?
23. Were the cliwenical and practical significance considered in interpreting results?
Recommendations
24. Were the conclusions/clinical recommendations supported by the study objectives, analysis and results?
Total quality score =