Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2011 Feb 17;353(1):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.008

Table 1.

Classification of regeneration defects observed in Rx shRNA transgenic embryos.

Classification Regeneration defect Regeneration phenotype Non-transgenic control1 Control shRNA2 Rx shRNA3 Rescue4
Category 1 No defect Elongated RPCs that span all retinal layers at the wound site 21/22
95.4%
16/16
100%
7/25
28%
7/13
53.8%
Category 2 Defective RPCs RPCs are shorter and/or rounder and sometimes disorganized at wound site 0/22
0%
0/16
0%
13/25
52%
5/13
38.4%
Category 3 Defective RPCs and RPE RPCs are defective as described above and the RPE is disorganized; not completely reformed around the wound 1/22
4.5%
0/16
0%
5/25
20%
1/13
7.7%

Morphological defects in retinal regeneration were scored at 9 days post-resection and the defects were assigned to each category

1

Non-transgenic control-wild type tadpoles

2

Control shRNA - tadpoles transgenic for the control shRNA

3

Rx shRNA- tadpoles transgenic for the Rx shRNA

4

Rescue- tadpoles co-transgenic for the Rx shRNA and the mRx transgene