Table 3.
Results of model-fitting comparison
| Estimated ECOT model | −2log L | df | ΔChi2 | Δdf | p-value | AIC | ΔAIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fathers
| |||||||
| Full model | 3364.02 | 1207 | - | - | - | 950.02 | - |
| Constrained, C=0 | 3364.02 | 1208 | .00 | 1 | 1.00 | 948.02 | -2.00 |
| Constrained, C=0 and m=0 | 3366.83 | 1209 | 2.81 | 1 | .09 | 948.83 | .81 |
| Constrained, C=0 and n=0 | 3364.08 | 1209 | .06 | 1 | .80 | 946.08 | −1.94 |
|
| |||||||
| Mothers
| |||||||
| Full model | 9116.59 | 3378 | - | - | - | 2360.59 | - |
| Constrained, C=0 | 9116.59 | 3379 | .00 | 1 | 1.00 | 2358.59 | −2.00 |
| Constrained, C=0 and m=0 | 9120.94 | 3380 | 3.51 | 1 | .06 | 2360.10 | 1.51 |
| Constrained, C=0 and n=0 | 9126.23 | 3380 | 9.64 | 1 | <.01 | 2366.23 | 7.64 |
Note.Best -fitting model in bold.