Skip to main content
. 2011 May 12;6(5):e19587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019587

Table 4. Details of sex-adjusted haplotype analysis for 3-SNP and 4-SNP windows showing the most significant results among the all possible sliding windows.a .

Group 1 Group 2 Combined
Haplotypes Cases Controls OR P asym P emp Cases Controls OR P asym P emp Cases Controls OR P asym P emp
rs3026393-rs1506-rs12421026 (S5-S6-S7)
OMNIBUS 5.48E-10 2.00E-05 7.93E-12* 2.00E-05 6.28E-23* 2.00E-05
TAG ( 111) 0.4244 0.4690 0.781 0.0511 0.9950 0.4202 0.4852 0.757 0.0187 0.1811 0.4185 0.4753 0.767 0.0021 0.0315
TAA ( 112) 0.0576 0.0062 12.7 6.40E-05 0.0045 0.1104 0.0114 20.8 3.60E-07 2.00E-05 0.0844 0.0096 16.8 6.87E-11 2.00E-05
TTG ( 121) 0.0837 0.0612 1.38 0.1660 1.0000 0.0403 0.0643 0.601 0.0666 05290 0.0617 0.0627 0.989 0.9490 1.0000
GTG ( 221) 0.0774 0.0088 10.3 1.98E-06 0.0001 0.1194 0.0141 11.4 2.15E-07 2.00E-05 0.0985 0.0122 10.7 2.22E-12 2.00E-05
GTA ( 222) 0.3434 0.4447 0.618 0.0002 0.0127 0.2838 0.4005 0.592 3.14E-05 0.00014 0.3105 0.4209 0.606 2.29E-08 2.00E-05
rs2071754-rs3026393-rs1506-rs12421026 (S4-S5-S6-S7)
OMNIBUS 3.54E-10* 2.00E-05 4.06E-11 2.00E-05 1.56E-18 2.00E-05
GTAG (1111) 0.4173 0.4637 0.752 0.0227 0.8958 0.4335 0.4864 0.773 0.0301 0.2292 0.4273 0.4739 0.761 0.0015 0.0217
GTAA (1112) 0.0518 0.0065 10.7 1.62E-04 0.0118 0.1123 0.0114 19.4 4.25E-05 2.00E-05 0.0832 0.0095 15.9 1.88E-10 2.00E-05
GTTG (1121) 0.0628 0.0417 1.49 0.1620 1.0000 0.0207 0.0371 0.529 0.0920 0.6592 0.0419 0.0391 1.04 0.8680 1.0000
AGTG (2221) 0.0654 0.0073 10.7 1.76E-05 0.0011 0.1199 0.0123 13.8 3.88E-07 2.00E-05 0.0939 0.0104 11.8 2.84E-11 2.00E-05
AGTA (2222) 0.3179 0.4274 0.583 2.62E-05 0.0118 0.2912 0.4014 0.600 4.95E-05 0.0003 0.3058 0.4132 0.594 2.90E-09 2.00E-05
a

Haplotypes are indicated in both ACGT format and the 1–2 (major-minor allele) format. The 4-SNP haplotypes are arranged in the same order as their corresponding 3-SNP (S5-S6-S7) counterparts for the sake of easy comparison; and the 3′ most marker rs2071754 and its alleles are underlined for easy recognition. Only haplotypes with a frequency of 0.05 or above in either cases or controls are shown. The odds ratios (OR) are shown in boldface if their corresponding haplotypes are significantly associated with high myopia (P emp <0.05 obtained by 50,000 permutations for each group of subjects under study). Note that the minimum P value achievable with 50,000 permutations is 2.00×10−5. The most significant result (asymptotic P values, Wald test; P asym) among all possible sliding windows in each group of subjects is marked by an asterisk (*). All three sets of analysis were adjusted for sex while the combined analysis was also adjusted for subject group.