Skip to main content
. 2011 May 12;6(5):e19527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019527

Table 3. Phenotype frequencies of CYP3A5, CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and ABCB1 between responder and nonresponder groups.

Responders Nonresponders Pb
Nā€Š=ā€Š76 (%)a Nā€Š=ā€Š29 (%)a
CYP3A5 Phenotype 1.000
Extensive (*1/*1 1/*3) 12 (16) 3 (10)
Poor (*3/*3) 64 (84) 26 (90)
CYP2D6 Phenotype 0.032
Extensive (*1,*2, *3, *6, *35) 64 (84) 26 (90)
Ultrarapid (*1xN, *2xN) 5 (7) 0 (0)
Intermediate (*9*10,*41) 5 (7) 0 (0)
Poor (*4/*4) 2 (3) 3 (10)
CYP2B6 Phenotype 0,639
Extensive (*1/*1) 43 (57) 18 (62)
Poor (*6) 27 (36) 10 (35)
Ultrarapid (*4) 4 (5) 0 (-)
CYP2C9 Phenotype 0.779
Extensive (*1/*1, *1/*2) 67 (88) 26 (90)
Intermediate (*1/*3) 6 (8) 2 (7)
Poor (*2, *3) 3 (4) 1 (3)
CYP2C19 Phenotype 0.260
Extensive (*1/*1) 54 (71) 19 (66)
Intermediate (*1/*2) 22 (29) 9 (31)
Poor (*2/*2) 0 (-) 1 (3)
ABCB1 Phenotype (C3435T) 0.266
Extensive (C/C) 24 (32) 14 (48)
Intermediate (C/T) 39 (51) 12 (41)
Poor (T/T) 13 (17) 3 (10)
a

Discrepancies in total numbers correspond to genotyping missing data.

b

Bold numbers indicate statistically significant differences between patients.

c

Non available data on SNP/genotype in two subjects (1 Responder and 1 Nonresponder) due to methodological problems. One patient showed *4/*6 genotype with unknown clinical significance, therefore it was not considered in phenotype analysis.