Skip to main content
. 2011 May;57(5):e185–e191.

Table 3.

Associations between organizational or cultural factors for participating FHTs and team climate scores

FACTOR UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS β (95% CI) PVALUE MULTIPLE VARIABLE ANALYSIS β (95% CI) PVALUE
Leadership scale score 0.63 (0.56 to 0.69) < .001 0.48 (0.40 to 0.55) < .001
Organizational culture
  • Group 0.13 (0.11 to 0.16) < .001 0.04 (0.001 to 0.07) .04
  • Developmental 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13) .002 0.05 (−0.005 to 0.10) .08
  • Hierarchical −0.20 (−0.23 to −0.16) < .001 −0.06 (−0.10 to −0.009) .02
  • Rational −0.08 (−0.13 to −0.03) .001 NA NA
No. of EMR capabilities used* 0.07 (−0.01 to 0.15) .10 0.03 (0.003 to 0.06) .03
Months operational as an FHT −0.012 (−0.02 to −0.004) .002 −0.003 (−0.0006 to −0.006) .04
EMR perceptions −0.05 (−0.10 to 0.003) .07 NA > .10
No. of staff in FHT 0.001 (−0.003 to 0.006) .60 NA NA
Full team meetings at least monthly −0.12 (−0.47 to 0.22) .50 NA NA
No. of patients per physician (< 1000, 1000–1999, ≥2000) 0.04 (−0.21 to 0.30) .75 NA NA
Single site versus multiple sites 0.09 (−0.23 to 0.41) .59 NA NA

CI—confidence interval, EMR—electronic medical record, FHT—family health team, NA—not applicable.

*

Of a possible 22, including scheduling appointments, billing, within-clinic messaging, clinical notes, prescribing information (drug interactions, warnings, direct-to-pharmacy prescribing), laboratory or radiology requisitions, viewing laboratory and imaging results (history and follow-up notes), patient demographic information, patient problem lists, medications, disease registries, decision-support tools, queries, and reminders for guideline-based interventions.