Skip to main content
. 2011 May;13(5):295–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00295.x

Table 4.

Results of meta-analyses for resection margin status, recurrence rate and survival after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) vs. open liver resction (OLR) for cases of malignant disease

Pathological and oncological outcomes Number of studies Patients Lap/Open SMD/OR (95% CI) P-value Study heterogeneity

I2 Q DF P-value
Studies comparing resection margin status for LLR vs. OLR for all types of malignant disease

 Resection margin (mm) 8 392 215/177 −0.356 (−1.061, 0.349)a 0.318 89.9% 69.41 7 <0.0001

 Resection margin <1 cm 6 351 138/213 0.511 (0.293, 0.893)b 0.030 13.5% 5.77 5 0.328

 Resection margin positive 8 591 250/341 0.524 (0.296, 0.927)b 0.026 0.00 5.56 7 0.591

Studies comparing long-term outcome with LLR vs. OLR for HCC only

 Hepatic recurrence rate 4 366 129/237 0.832 (0.527, 1.314)b 0.430 0.00 0.64 3 0.887

 Disease-free survival 6 424 166/258 0.990 (0.605, 1.621)b 0.969 0.00 1.88 5 0.864

 Overall survival 7 500 186/314 1.500 (1.002, 2.246)b 0.049 0.00 3.62 6 0.728

Lap, laparoscopic; SMD, standardized mean difference; OR, odds ratio; I2, index used to measure the extent of study heterogeneity in meta-analysis; Q, statistic used to assess for study heterogeneity in meta-analysis; DF, degrees of freedom.

a

SMD with 95% CI.

b

OR with 95% CI.