Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1113–1148. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00719.x

Table 3.

Percentage of Roles Reported by Individual Personalities in each Type of Dyad, and for Gender

Domain
 Role
 Personality
 Gender
I-Ia
 I----------E
 E-E
 F
 M
(n = 38)% (n = 25)% (n = 25)% (n = 44)% (n = 76)% (n = 56)%
Locale graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0001.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0002.jpg
Energy graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0003.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0004.jpg
Outsiders graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0005.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0006.jpg
Dialog graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0007.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0008.jpg
Content graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0009.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0010.jpg
Intimacy graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0011.jpg graphic file with name nihms-265782-t0012.jpg

Note: Percentages may not sum to 100% because of No Mentions. For example, in the matched Introvert dyads, the two Locale roles sum to 87%, indicating 13% No Mentions in the interviews.

a

I = Introvert; E = Extravert