Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 9;2011:201953. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neq029

Table 1.

Interpretation of the results of MIC for antifungal drugs against vaginal yeasts of C. albicans (n = 58) and non-C. albicans (n = 31).

Candida albicans Non-Candida albicans
Antifungals Sa DDSb Rc S DDS R
n % n % n % n % n % n %
FLU 55 94.8 3 5.2 26 83.9 5 16.1
ITRA 48 82.8 4 6.9 6 10.3 18 58.1 4 12.9 9 29.0
KETO 20 34.5 23 9.7 15 25.8 9 29.0 7 22.6 15 48.4
MICO 42 72.4 14 24.1 2 3.5 6 19.4 20 64.5 5 16.1
VORI 57 98.3 1 1.7 30 96.8 1 3.2
AMB 57 98.3 1 1.7 31 100.0

DDS, dose-dependent susceptibility; R, resistant.

aS: Isolates with MIC ≤ 8  μg mL–1 for FLU, ≤0.125 μg mL-1 for ITRA, KETO, and MICO, and ≤1 μg mL–1 for AMB and VORI, bDDS: Endpoints for antifungal agents: isolates with MIC between 16 and 32 μg mL–1 for FLU, 0.25–0.5 μg mL–1 for ITRA, KETO, and MICO, and 2 μg mL–1 for VORI, cR: Isolates with MIC ≥ 64 μg mL–1 for FLU, ≥1 μg mL–1 for ITRA, KETO, and MICO, ≥ 4 μg mL–1 for VORI and ≥2 μg mL–1 for AMB.