Table 1.
2C [pg] | 2n1) | 2C/2n [Mbp] | LTR retrotransposon densities (real-time PCR) | LTR retrotransposon densities (dot blot) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ty1-copia | Ty3-gypsy | Helos1 | Ty1-copia | Ty3-gypsy | Helos1 | ||||
E. acicularis | 2.472) | 20 | 121 | 1507 | 158 | 4 | 36671 | 1859 | 686 |
E. austriaca | 4.84 | 16 | 296 | 4290 | 101 | 622 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. carniolica | 2.58 | 20 | 126 | 1971 | 159 | 133 | 29843 | 2064 | 801 |
E. cellulosa | 0.84 | n.a. | n.a. | 1236 | 193 | 10 | 9875 | 918 | 300 |
E. eryhtropoda | 5.48 | 18 | 298 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. interstincta | n.a. | 40/52 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. macrostachya | 9.80 | 38 | 253 | 2217 | 119 | 181 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. mamillata | 4.60 | 16 | 282 | 3928 | 89 | 677 | 85510 | 1279 | 7186 |
E. ovata | 1.40 | 10 | 137 | 1007 | 174 | 19 | 35417 | 1517 | 816 |
E. palustris | 4.20 | 16 | 257 | 3464 | 113 | 435 | 79966 | 1445 | 8132 |
E. quinqueflora | 1.12 | 136 | 8 | 1112 | 241 | 2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. sterneri | 18.00 | 74 | 238 | 2217 | 107 | 199 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. uniglumis | 10.20 | 46 | 217 | 3899 | 149 | 320 | 81196 | 2845 | 5634 |
E. vigens | 8.74 | 36 | 238 | 2507 | 111 | 243 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
E. waltersii | 11.00 | 39 | 276 | 3319 | 131 | 386 | 70679 | 900 | 6735 |
E. xyridiformis | 5.50 | 18 | 299 | 2739 | 183 | 291 | 92801 | 1792 | 6676 |
Significance of phylogenetic signal | - | * | ** | * | * | ** | ** | - | ** |
1) Chromosome numbers were taken from previous studies ([68]: E. palustris, E. waltersii; [49]: E. sterneri because of sample identity; [69]: E. quinqueflora because of population identity; [35]: E. interstincta). For the remaining samples, chromosome numbers were counted by O. Rotreklová and P. Bureš (unpublished data).
2) An average of seven samples, each representing a different population (see Results and Discussion).
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01