Table 1.
Author | Year | Number of patients/cardiac pacemakers (n) | Brand of cardiac pacemaker | Kind of study | Interference | Brand of CE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dirks et al. | 2008 | 5 | No specification | In vivo | No | Given Imaging |
Bandorski et al. | 2008 | 21 | Medtronic, Osypka, Siemens, Vitatron, Ela, Guidant, St. Jude Medical | In vitro | No | Given Imaging + Olympus |
Bandorski et al. | 2006 | 1 | Biotronik | In vitro | No | Given Imaging |
Payeras et al. | 2005 | 20 | No specification | In vitro + In vivo | No | Given Imaging + Test Cap |
Bandorski et al. | 2005 | 45 | No specification | In vivo | No | Given Imaging |
Dubner et al. | 2005 | 100 | St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, Guidant, Biotronik, Sorin | In vivo | Yes (n = 4, noise mode) | Given Imaging |
Guyomar et al. | 2004 | 1 | ELA | In vivo | No | Given Imaging |
Leighton et al. | 2004 | 5 | No specification | In vivo | No | Given Imaging |