Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jan;165(1):33–41. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.254

Table 5.

Mean (SD) VIP Attendance and StimQ Scoresa

Attended 4 of 4 VIP Visits (n=85) Attended 1 to 3 VIP Visits (n=37) Unadjustedb
Adjustedc
Mean Difference (95% CI) ES Mean Difference (95% CI) ES
StimQ total score 20.5 (6.2) 18.4 (8.3) 2.0 (−0.7 to 4.7) 0.29 (−.10 to 0.69) 2.1 (−0.6 to 4.9) 0.31 (−0.09 to 0.71)
ALM score 2.8 (1.2) 2.7 (1.1) 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.6) 0.12 (−0.27 to 0.51) 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.6) 0.12 (−0.28 to 0.53)
READ score 7.9 (4.0) 8.0 (4.7) −0.02 (−1.7 to 1.6) −0.01 (−0.40 to 0.38) 0.05 (−1.6 to 1.7) 0.01 (−0.39 to 0.41)
PIDA score 3.6 (1.6) 2.8 (1.7) 0.8 (0.2 to 1.5) 0.51 (0.12 to 0.90) 0.8 (0.2 to 1.5) 0.51 (0.11 to 0.91)
PVR score 6.1 (2.8) 5.0 (2.8) 1.1 (0.003 to 2.2) 0.39 (0.001 to 0.79) 1.1 (0.01 to 2.2) 0.40 (0.004 to 0.80)

Abbreviations: ALM, Availability of Learning Materials; BB, building blocks; CI, confidence interval; ES, effect size; PIDA, Parental Involvement in Developmental Advancement; PVR, Parental Verbal Responsivity; READ, Reading Activities; VIP, video interaction project.

a

Data include families with 1 or more visits only.

b

Unadjusted estimates based on independent-samples t test.

c

Adjusted estimates based on multiple regression adjusting for all sociodemographic characteristics.