TABLE 4.
MSG intake |
||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | P for trend | |
No. of participants | 1438 | 1439 | 1438 | 1439 | 1438 | |
Median of MSG intake (g/d) | 0.63 | 1.18 | 1.76 | 2.57 | 4.19 | |
IQR of MSG intake (g/d) | 0.42–0.78 | 1.04–1.33 | 1.63–1.94 | 2.34–2.84 | 3.58–5.58 | |
No. of overweight participants | 86 | 159 | 162 | 208 | 209 | |
Model 12 | 1.00 | 1.05 (0.80, 1.39) | 0.88 (0.67, 1.17) | 1.04 (0.79, 1.36) | 1.40 (1.07, 1.84) | <0.01 |
Model 23 | 1.00 | 1.00 (0.75, 1.32) | 0.83 (0.63, 1.10) | 0.96 (0.73, 1.27) | 1.33 (1.01, 1.75) | <0.01 |
All models were constructed by using Cox regression with gamma shared frailty over the household level. IQR, interquartile range.
Adjusted for age, sex, urban residence, and region (south or north area).
Adjusted as for model 1 plus smoking status (current or not current), alcohol consumption (yes or no), individual income inflated to 2006 (quintile), education (missing, ≤6 y, 7–9 y, or ≥10 y), physical activity (quintile), and dietary intakes (quintile) of total energy, sodium, potassium, and calcium.