Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Sci. 2011 May;35(4):638–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01174.x

Table 14.

Properties of different inflectional neighborhoods.

gender inflectional neighborhood size (%) mean log(form frequ.) mean log(lemma frequ.)
masculine 43.19 (48.55) 1.99 (2.05) 4.14 (4.40)
masculine 8.65 (6.52) 1.95 (2.25) 3.92 (4.99)
feminine 67.43 (71.93) 2.15 (2.20) 4.34 (4.53)
feminine 7.88 (5.26) 2.33 (2.77) 3.94 (5.28)
neuter 60.65 (83.33) 2.11 (2.20) 3.98 (4.22)
neuter 14.15 (4.17) 1.89 (2.62) 3.28 (5.93)

Note: We present data from the training corpus used in the model with the data from the sample used in the corpus analysis in parenthesis. The latter is a more representative corpus since it was randomly drawn from the Frequency Dictionary of Contemporary Serbian (Kostić, 1999) (see the description of the training corpus for more details).