Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb;12(2):463–473. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.2.463

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of mutations in Nef from SIVmac239 on its internalization. (A) Schematic representation of Nef from SIVmac239 and location of different endocytic motifs. Whereas the two tyrosine-based endocytic motifs (Y28GRL and Y39SQS), which were implicated in the binding to AP-2, are found near the N terminus, the three motifs implicated in the binding to β-COP (D184E185), AP complexes (L194M195), and V1H (D204D205) are located in the C-terminal flexible loop of the protein. (m) is myristate. (B) Effects of mutations in Nef from SIVmac239 on its internalization at steady state. Hybrid CD8-Nef proteins were expressed in Jurkat or 293-T cells and their surface levels [% CD8(+)] were evaluated by FACS. The surface expression of CD8 alone (lane 2) was set to 100% and the amount of internalization of the chimeras (lanes 3–11) was calculated relative to this value. The empty pEF-BOS vector was used as a negative control (lane 1). Error bars indicate SEM from at least three independent experiments. (C) Levels of expression of Nef chimeras in 293-T and Jurkat cells. Levels of different Nef proteins were determined by Western blotting (lanes 2–11). They were compared with the endogenous actin.