Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2011 Feb 26;45(4):325–339. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.12.006

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(Top) Comparison of DAR sensitivity in SIP-naïve and SIP-alcohol experienced DAT+/+ mice. Mice experienced with alcohol consumption in SIP showed lower levels of DAR sensitivity than SIP-naïve mice. The vertical bars indicate the standard error of the group means. * significantly different from the SIP- naïve control group (Dunnett's t-test). (Bottom) DAT uptake efficiency at baseline in SIP-naïve and SIP-alcohol experienced DAT+/+ mice. Mice experienced with alcohol consumption in SIP had higher DAT efficiency than SIP-naïve mice. The vertical bars indicate the standard error of the group means. * significant group difference as determined by ANOVA. See Figure 3b and the Methods for additional details.